Posts Tagged ‘politics’

Ostrich Syndrome, Anyone?

Permalink

Ok, I’m sorry – but our President and his administration are a bunch of idiots.  [via: Scalzi]

We Need Better Leaders

Permalink

It’s incidents like this one that demonstrate to me that there is a general sense of paranoia in American culture these days that borders on insanity.  In the article linked above, you have a father who mistakenly ordered a hard lemonade for his 7-year-old son, followed by the hysteria of the ballpark guard and the local judicial system.  This case is demonstrative of the fact that parents are considered villains until proven innocent, at least in the eyes of our legal system.

Having worked briefly in the social services system, I know there are parents out there who are either negligent or deliberately abusive (and sometimes both); so the existence of a social services system is both justified and necessary.  But what I think the current set of laws forgets is that parents are human and sometimes make genuine, honest mistakes – as the father in this case seems to have done.  But rather than deal with this as a mistake, the courts overreacted and demonized the father, immediately assuming the worst and raised his case to a ridiculous level that seems, to me, to be completely unnecessary.

This sort of thing goes right along with the current trend of political correctness in our society that people are now afraid of making smart and right decisions in favor of making stupid, politically correct decisions that will, in theory, offend the least number of people.  It makes me wonder at how such people ever got to be our leaders, and it frightens me not a little bit that we’ve given them so much power over our day-to-day lives.  Common sense, critical thinking, and wisdom seem to be skills lost on the vast majority of people in power nowadays, and what we’re left with are spineless puppets who would rather cater to poll numbers and public opinion1.  It makes me afraid, very afraid.

1 Don’t get me wrong – I do want our leaders to pay attention to what the people want, to an extent.  We do, after all, elect the leaders that we hope will have our best interests in mind.  But when you end up with leaders who are faced with the kind of foolishness presented in this case, and who won’t act on with a certain level of wisdom, then I question whether said leader should be sitting in that particular seat of power.

Who?

Permalink

Is it just me, or does the Qualified Candidate pool get smaller, shallow, and more stagnant with every election cycle?

xkcd On Barack Obama

Permalink

xkcd has a rare political post today about why Barack Obama may well be the best presidential candidate we have this election cycle because of his commitment to open government.  It’s a compelling read, and I’d be curious to hear your thoughts on it.  (Comments are closed on that entry, but please feel free to bring thoughts and comments back here.  Seriously, I’m curious…)

Popular Elections - Not What You Think

Permalink

I love today’s Non-Sequitur:1

Non-Sequitur

It does seem like we elect government officials based on emotions and popularity and how pretty we think they are, rather than electing them based on whether or not they’re actually qualified for the job. 

I don’t really care much for politicians.  By and large I think they’re all a bunch of crooks and liars.  I’m sure that most of them have convinced themselves that they have the best interests of their constituents in mind, but I think they just like to tell themselves beautiful lies to justify poor judgment and bad decisions.  It seems to me that the honest politician who is wise in his decision-making, aware of his constituents’ needs, and sensitive to those needs and desires is a truly rare breed.  I also think that this type of politician, the one with true integrity, also rarely makes it to a higher political office where he (or she) is most needed, possibly because the other screwed up politicians make it impossible to do so.  And so our political system suffers under the clumsy paws of unqualified leaders while the good ones are kept under boot and heel.

I know, I know – this is a very cynical outlook on politics in our country, but the more I see of politics in general and politicians in particular, the more disgusted I become with the antics.  They still remind me more of a bunch of squabbling 8-year-olds fighting over a ball on the playground rather than grown adults who should have enough sense and maturity to behave like the leaders of one of the most powerful nations on Earth.

Of course, we really only have ourselves to blame for our leaders since most people don’t really seem to care two bits about the qualifications of their candidates, choosing instead to focus on how much they seem like they’d be good for the job. 

Ok, this is my one political rant for the year.  I’m good to go until 2009.  As you were.

  1. Though I have to admit that most days I do find the comic just plain strident.[back]

Failure?

Permalink

I try very hard to not pay attention to the world of politics, but seriously – the worst presidency ever?  Even the second worst presidency ever? C’mon – I don’t buy that.

Feeling Snarky

Permalink

I’m having a day of snark – one of those where everything I want to write about involves some sort of sarcastic response toward ridiculous opinions and viewpoints.  Hazards of coming off a couple of sick days, I suppose – I tend to be a little less patient and tolerant.

For starters, in response to the shooting at Virginia Tech the other day, gun control outcriers have cropped again.  And they’re welcome to their opinions, of course.  But I still think they’re wrong.  There seems to be this mentality that allowing people to own and carry weapons will only cause the crime rate to increase, since guns will be that much more available.  Almost without exception, though, I find that those opinions come from folks who have had very little exposure to guns.  For those of us who have grown up with guns and have been taught how to safely handle them, we know that those folks who make the decision to 1) own guns and 2) earn the license that gives them the right to carry said guns are far more likely to handle them safely.  These are the people who respect these weapons enough to, get this, keep one with them at all times.  The people who go on these shooting sprees usually acquire their weapons by illegal means or, if they’ve acquired them legally, haven’t bothered to learn how to use them properly or gained the licenses necessary to carry them.  In short, shooters like this do not respect the laws that govern the use and ownership of guns.  It places those of us who actually do respect these laws in a difficult spot because the resultant fear from tragedies like these threatens the right of American citizens to own and carry guns. 

Recognize this – psychos like this Virginia Tech shooter will always be able to find guns when they want them, no matter what sort of legislation is in place to make it “impossible” to do so.  The black market will never be shut down.  All these gun control laws do is make it more difficult for honest citizens to put a quick end to a shooter’s spree should such a crisis arise.  Personally, I feel much safer with a licensed-to-carry citizen next to me than without.  But then again, I realize that said citizen has been trained in how to use that weapon and would never casually use said weapon unless there was no other option. 

The other thing that has my snark up right now involves Fox News apparent posthumous besmirching of Kurt Vonnegut.  Apparently, Fox News ran a story the other day that wasn’t terribly flattering to the late science fiction author.  Ultimately, I couldn’t care less what Fox News thinks of the author or how people are reacting to the news story.  I deliberately tend to avoid the news in any form exactly because the news seems to bring out the worst in people.

What I am a little bit surprised by is Fox News’s deliberate mention of Vonnegut being a ‘leftist.’ Well, of course he was a leftist – most science fiction authors are.  Read just about any science fiction novel, and you’ll see worlds in which religion is all but dead, with God having been debunked and traditional and historical forms of morality having been given up in favor of less restrictive and more ‘liberating’ personal values.  These are worlds where anything goes, guilt-free, so long as others are not harmed in the process.  This is the ideal of 21st-century man, to live as he desires rather than being bound to a set of rules set down by a third party, whatever that third party may be.  This view is liberal and leftist, and for some reason this viewpoint, this hopeful future, goes hand-in-hand with science fiction.  The shirking of religion, with all its rules and regulations, is seen as progress for mankind, and science fiction embraces this hope with vigor, eagerness, and passion.

What I’d like to see is science fiction where the future world doesn’t look all that much different to the world we see today, with the obvious exception of more advanced technology.  I’d like to see some science fiction where, if anything, morality and religion have become more entrenched, just to see what that kind of world would like.  I wouldn’t mind seeing such worlds built in both a positive and negative light, since either outcome is equally likely, in my opinion.  Essentially, I’d like to see a more deliberate exploration of such universes.  And just once, I’d like to see a world of the future where religion isn’t the demon that it’s made out to be today, where religion is actually beneficial and productive.  Stephen Lawhead attempts this in his Empyrion set, and Orson Scott Card presents another version in his Ender series.  But these are the exceptions, rather than the rule.  I just tend to think that science fiction does not necessarily need to be divorced from religion and morality in order to be good and exceptional.  But since many times science fiction expresses the ideologies of each writer, they tend toward a certain brand of preachiness against religion that grows wearisome after a while. 

So that’s a bit of the snark factor bouncing around in my brain today.  And now that it’s out there, perhaps it’ll leave me alone.

Comic Boot

Permalink

“Non-sequitur” is real close to getting the boot from my list of comics on my daily read.

Dream Sequence

Permalink

I had a dream last night – I was sitting in a church, listening while the pastor rolled off a diatribe against Hillary running for president and how we, as Christians, need to stand against her so that she cannot attain the office.  What the pastor somehow managed to miss was that Hillary was actually sitting in his congregation this day.  Someone who noticed got up and went to her to apologize and explain that it isn’t usually like this in this church, bringing the whole service else to a screeching halt.  The pastor was unrepentant for his words, but was embarrassed only because his speech blew up in his face.  Everyone else simply felt guilty because they agreed with what he said and now were faced with the very person against whom their feelings were directed.

The whole dream was somewhat unsettling and kind of sad because it was, in my opinion, a fairly accurate reflection on reality.  I suspect that if this scenario was to play out in real life, it would probably look much like the way it happened in my dream.

This was just something I felt like sharing.  There’s actually a couple of related thoughts that spawn from this, but I’m not sure yet if I’ll actually write them up.  I tend to try to steer clear of political topics as much as I can, simply because they tend to make me feel stressed.  But we’ll see – sometimes I don’t really get much of a choice in these things.

DST

Permalink

Daylight Savings Time this year starts this Sunday, three weeks earlier than usual.  For some, this is a good thing.  For others, not so much.  I’m one of those in the latter group.

When I was a kid, I thought DST was a good thing – I loved having that extra hour of daylight during the summer months to spend outside playing basketball or baseball or fishing or whatever plethora of activities I found to occupy my time and interest.  And I always hated the fact that we lost that hour during the long, dismal winter months.

Then, a few years back, my wife and I moved to Indiana.  At the time, this state didn’t observe the semi-annual change of the clocks, and for the first time we discovered that we actually kind of liked the idea of not having to worry about changing our clocks.  Granted, it made things interesting as we were technically on Eastern Time or Central Time, depending on which half of the year we were currently in.  But the idea of not having to deal with the change was enjoyable.

Of course, Indiana re-adopted DST,1 so now we’re back to changing our clocks twice a year.  Personally, I think the idea of DST is something that ought to be dropped completely in the US.  We’re one of the few countries in the world who uses it, and the supposed benefits of energy conservation seems like a tenuous argument in favor of the policy.  I think I’d much rather forgot about the whole thing and just deal with the fact that daylight is going to be shorter by an hour and see the sun come up a little earlier in the morning. 

But that’s just me…

  1. There’s talk again of going back yet again and dropping the use of DST.[back]