Posts Tagged ‘blogging’

Of Musa and Flood Lights

Permalink

Just a couple of things I want to comment on real quick:

1) I added yet another WordPress module to my site today.  Two of them, in fact.  The first is the official website for the 100 Voices in the Night Project.  There will be brief bios for all the contributing authors as well as samples of each one’s work.  There will likely also be news updates as we get the project off the ground, so check back there often to see what’s happening with this unique flash fiction anthology.

The second WP module is a fiction archive called Musa in the Thicket.  The title found its origins in the Stephen King article I mentioned a couple of days ago.  I’ve been hosting for a while now an archive of fantasy fiction written by a friend of mine.  The story arc revolves around the Warlord CCG as set in the Anything forum of the Temple of Lore fan site.  There is also some ToL-related fiction that I’ve written, called Fury, and a rather large cooperative story arc written by a number of ToLers.  I’ve also archive the first chapter of a Dark Tower/Halo 2-based story arc that I’m writing that features a number of the TTL Gunslingers clan members.  I’m not really sure what else will find its way to this archive tower, so feel free to check it out and wander around a bit.

2) I spent the evening tonight installing a couple of floodlights on our small barn.  With the shorter days and the coming winter, the extra illumination out there will be very, very useful.  The wiring is archaic – the barn still uses a small fuse box.  I managed to blow the fuses only once and shocked myself only twice.  Turns out the light switch going to the wire I was working with broken – in the ‘on’ position.  Live and learn.  One of these days, I really need to get my hands on a wire tester. 

Thank you.  That is all.

A Noticeable Shift

Permalink

Over the past few weeks, I’ve seen a noticeable shift in focus on my blogroll.  A lot of the blogs I’ve been reading that deal with faith and spirituality issues have been thinned a great deal while my writing-related blogroll has expanded substantially.  I’m actually rather amused by the shift because it says something about my interest levels in these two types of blogs.

The trimming of faith-related blogs from my blogroll is not indicative of any disinterest in the topics and issues of the Christian faith.  No, I’m still quite interested in such topics, and I continue to keep the Open Dialogue forum running in the event that anyone would care to use it for discussion, as still happens occasionally.  The trimming does, however, reflect my dissatisfication with the vast majority of faith-based blogs on the web these days.  Most of the ones I’ve read seem to ultimately only spin their wheels in an endless cycle of philosophical and theological rumination.  Except that, instead of digesting truth and processing it to some worthwhile end, most of these individuals seem to prefer to spit it back out onto the ground, a warm, soggy mess that, in the end, never yields any kind of spiritual nutrition. 

I guess you could say that I’ve grown frustrated with the seemingly endless process that most Christians today go through of spending entirely too much time wondering aloud about the nature of our relationship with God and what we as Christians are to do about it.  It could be that these folks are, indeed, physically active in their churches and communities trying to apply the truth of Scripture to their lives and reflect Christ to those around them.  If such is the case, however, it is not reflected in the content of their blogs.  What I see are continual arguings and bickering among folks who are supposed to be of like mind, rehashing issues and ideas and topics that have been hashed over and over again, seemingly with no ground gained.  I find this both troubling and particularly frustrating to watch and be a part of.  They never leave the communities of their local churches because they’ve become mired in the process of “figuring things out” rather than taking the Good News to those who’ve never heard.  They’ve lost sight of what they are to be about and what it is they are here to do. 

For a while I lent my voice to the din, expressing my thoughts and sharing in the process of learningm, but in recent weeks, I’ve opted to back out and back away from most of these ongoing discussions.  The words, actions, and reactions of so many involved – Christian and non-Christian alike – have served only to exacerbate my cynicism toward the American church.  So, rather than continue to involve myself through this medium and risk losing myself completely to such negative attitudes, I’ve backed away and left them alone, choosing instead to take a more personal, one-on-one approach with folks via email, IM, and face-to-face encounters.  And these I find much more satisfying. 

In the vacuum this change has brought, I’ve begun to more aggressively pursue my writing, and so my writing blogroll has expanded to fill the void left by the trimming of my blogroll’s other half.  Writing has given me that creative outlet my inner artist has so craved and proven to be much more refreshing than I could have expected.  I still don’t get to write nearly as much as I’d like to yet, but I’m becoming more and more involved in the writing community.  In the process I’m getting to kill two birds with a single stone – I get to write all these fun stories while being able to periodically talk about faith-related issues with interested people. 

It’s an interesting ride, to say the least, and I feel content in being able to have, in some ways, the best of both worlds.

Whew!

Permalink

I feel like there’s a lot going on lately.  I’ve actually been looking at my involvements and trying to decide if I need to start cutting back on some things, handing of some obligations to others and focusing on the ones that are most near and dear to my heart.  I’m tempted.  I’m sorely tempted.

I have blog entries to write – if only I can clear out some time.  I have even more stories that I need to get on paper and others that I need to polish, clean up, and submit.  I’m also now involved in a new project that has huge potential for fun times, one that I’m hoping to be able to say more about in the near future.  I have some clan fiction I want to write, am actually writing.  The first chapter’s rough draft is done, just needs a little spit and polish.  And what’s particularly fun about this is that one of my fellow clan members is a talented artist and is going to do an illustration or two per chapter.  I’m writing in Stephen King’s Dark Tower universe about a new clan of gunslingers.  It’s going to be an epic that personally involves each of the online personas of those clan members who want to get involved.  There will likely also be some cross-universe interactive collaboration with another writing clan member at some point in the future.  Halo meets the Dark Tower meets the Gunslingers.  It’s gonna be big, I tell ya’.

For now, I have work obligations to tend to.  More to come in the next few days.

Banner

Permalink

You’ll notice that there’s now a banner at the top of this site for an upcoming Apex anthology called Aegri Somnia.  Now, banners and advertising are not generally things that I like to do.  In fact, I’ve gone out of my way to deliberately avoid annoying my readers with campaigns and ads.  So, it should say something when I believe in a product or company enough to break from my hard-and-fast rule to put ads on my site.

Here’s the skinny on Aegri Somnia (from the Apex Digest website):

Aegri Somnia translated literally means “a sick man’s dreams.” Loosely, it can mean “troubled dreams.” The first twelve Apex Featured Writers were tasked with writing the darkest, scariest short fiction their twisted minds could create using the theme of “aegri somnia.”

  • The Details: Title: Aegri Somnia
  • Short horror fiction anthology, with twelve new stories
  • Each story is between 2500 and 7500 words in length
  • Release date will be early December 2006
  • The first 200 trade paperback copies preordered and purchased will be signed by the twelve contributors, the cover artist, and the editor
  • The first 50 limited edition hardcover copies preordered and purchased will be signed by the twelve contributors, the cover artist, and the editor
  • Trade Paperback Price: $14.95
  • Limited Edition Hardcover Price: $29.95

The cover art was created by the talented Michael Bielaczyc of Aradani Studios. Justin Stewart designed the lettering.

Aegri Somnia contributors:


  • Mari Adkins – July 05

  • Rhonda Eudaly – September 05

  • Angeline Hawkes – November 05

  • Lavie Tidhar – December 05

  • Nancy Fulda – January 06

  • Christopher Rowe – February 06

  • Steven Savile – March 06

  • Jennifer Pelland – April 06

  • Eugie Foster – May 06

  • Scott Nicholson – June 06

  • Bryn Sparks – July 06

  • Cherie Priest – August 06

Those are the pertinent details folks.  I’m a huge fan of Apex’s products, so if you like sci-fi and horror, this is the best place to find to the two together.  Aegri Somnia is going to be a fantastic collection.  Go put your copy on order.

Total Geek

Permalink

Ok, bear with me for a few moments.  My inner geek needs an audience.

Those of you who have been reading me for a while know that I’m an avid Halo/Halo 2 fan.  A little while back, I was invited to join the writing staff for a relatively new blog for gamers called Dead Man’s Hand.  The guys (and gal) who ran this blog were members of a Halo 2 clan called the TTL Gunslingers.  At the time I joined the staff, I was the only writer for the blog who was not already a Gunslinger.

Earlier this week I finally completed the application process for the clan and received my invite.  And in purusing the clan discussion forum, I noticed that the software they were using was not the popular phpBB.  It was a relatively new forum software called Simple Machines, and it didn’t take long in playing around with it to be very, very impressed – so impressed, in fact, that I have since converted my own discussion board – Open Dialogue – to the SMF software.

Here’s where the gushing comes in – the features in SMF are, quite simply, amazing:

  • The installation of SMF had a significant WordPress feel to it – upload the files, run the install, complete the very simple form, and let the install program do its thing.  All I had to do at that point was sit back and watch.  It did take a little longer to install and setup than WordPress does, but then again, SMF has quite a few more files and tables.
  • I was hugely impressed with the fact that the SMF installation actually paused several times throughout the process.  The reason for this is to give the server a break by not chewing up all the site’s bandwidth.  It was a very conscientious touch on the part of the programmers, and I was very impressed with the foresight and consideration put into that bit of code.
  • One of the things that discussion forum administrators dread when switching from one forum software to another is converting the old forum into a format that is usable with the new one.  It’s not generally a simple process, and things almost always end up looking and acting screwy.  The conversion from phpBB to SMF was every bit as easy, clean, and simple as the installation process itself was.  You can browse the forum now and never see any indication that it started out as a phpBB site.
  • Adding modifications to SMF is likewise a breeze.  With phpBB anytime a modification or hack is added, you have to follow a rather complicated and time-consuming process.  Half a dozen or more files have to be opened, specific bits of code located and either modified or have new bits of code added around them.  It’s always a rigorous task and not much fun.  And the downside is that whenever the forum software undergoes an upgrade to a new version, all those modifications are overwritten and have to be put back in place.  With SMF the modification folder is simply uploaded to the ‘Packages’ folder inside the forum directory structure, then click the ‘Install’ button in the admin panel, and within second the modification is active.  No files to open, no code to hack, and the modifications are persistent through upgrades.  I was nearly weeping for joy at this point.
  • In phpBB the admin panel is an almost completely separate environment from the forum itself.  It sometimes feels like you are interacting with two completely different websites whenever you have to go into phpBB’s admin panel to take care of some issue in the forum.  With SMF the admin panel is actually built right into the forum itself.  The headers and footers are all there, and the level of administrative integration is astoundingly comprehensive. 
  • phpBB includes only the basic and most commonly used features in their base installation.  Everything else has to be added as a hack or a mod.  SMF has a lot of those extra features built right in.  For instance, you can easily print a printer-friendly version of any discussion thread.  You can email a friend with a link to a particular discussion right from the thread itself.  Offensive posts can be quickly and easily reported to a moderator.  Private messages can actually be sent to multiple recipients at the same time.  SMF even has RSS built in.  All this is automatic, with no additional work aside from the installation needed on the part of the forum administrator.  Did I mention that I was impressed?
  • One of the things that I have always wished phpBB could do was have sublevels of certain discussion boards.  For instance, an entertainment and media discussion board could be broken down further into a music board, books and literature board, games board, and so on.  Again, SMF has this feature built right in.  Any board can have child boards, which themselves can have child boards, etc.  It’s a great way to organize specific types of discussions and keep them all together.  I’ve been working on reorganizing much of the content on Open Dialogue in a more logical fashion.
  • SMF also gives both administrators and users a higher level of control.  Users can select their own custom titles, attach files to forum posts for ease of sharing, and create custom text to display beneath their avatar.  Administrators jobs are made easier by automating certain functions.  If a user selects an avatar that is too large, SMF will automatically resize the image to manageable dimensions.  No more need for people to play around in Photoshop to crop the image just so.

As I’ve said, SMF is a truly remarkable and impressive bit of software.  The only modification I wanted that didn’t come standard was a spoiler tag, to hide spoiler information in certain movie, book, and video games threads on the site.  And the activation of the modification was so simple I couldn’t believe how quick and painless it was.  I’m looking forward to using this software more and trying to get the forum active again. 

I’ve been considering broadening the scope of the board to include more than just theological and philosophical discussions, though I do still want that to be an important board.  I tend to think that there might be interest in a board that does more, and now that I have the ability for child boards, I think managing a higher level of content will be a much more manageable process.  So, come on over, check us out, and please offer up suggestions of new boards that can be added and what sort of directions Open Dialogue should go in.  It’s a community project, an open marketplace of ideas, and the more people who share in it, the better and more successful it will be.

I’ll keep the door open and the light on for you.

Reader Interest Poll

Permalink

Ok, now I’m curious (based on which of my latest entries have actually received comments).  A simple request, if you please: if you read my blog, whether it be through my RSS feed, through my email subscription, or through regular visits (or even just happened upon my blog accidentally), I want to know what draws you to my blog.  What do you read?  What topics interest you the most?  What would you like to see me write about more often?  What would you like to see me write about less often? 

I just want to get a feel for the type of readership I have, and frankly, I’m not opposed to adjusting the content of my writings to match my readers’ interests.  So please, lurkers and regular commenters alike, lend me your feedback and responses here!  I’m genuinely curious! 

Dead Man’s Hand

Permalink

I was recently invited to join the writing staff of Dead Man’s Hand, a blog dedicated to gaming, written by gamers.  I just posted my inaugural article, so feel free to jump over and check it out.  I plan to funnel more of my gaming content over there from now on, so bookmark the site if gaming interests you, subscribe to the Atom feed, and keep tabs on what’s happening in the gaming community!

Making Money While You Blog

Permalink

I’ve noticed a number of bloggers recently who have added PayPal forms to their blogs for those individuals who wish to contribute to the blog in a financial way.  This has, of course, caused me to raise one eyebrow in a very Mr. Spock-ian sort of way.1 Basically, I question of the ethics of this with some bloggers.

Some bloggers contribute snippets of code and new plugins for the various bloggins platforms.  The ones who include PayPal forms on their sites as sort of a virtual ‘tip jar’ are, I believe, justified in doing so.  They correctly point out that coding takes time and effort, and while all this code is open-source and free to the public to have, use, and modify as they see fit, I see nothing wrong with allowing users of said code to show their gratitude and support for these gifted individuals by donating $5 or $10 here and there to continue to support these people developing new innovations for the web-based tools we use on a regular basis.  The same goes for those bloggers who contribute information to their readers that is useful and practical, people who blog about, for example, health issues and how up-and-coming writers can improve their craft, etc.  These are the writers who are presenting thoroughly researched material, not just their opinions.

The bloggers whose ethics I question are those who include PayPal forms on their sites when all they write about are their opinions or merely the (comparatively) trivial facts of their lives.  I can’t see how they justify asking for monetary contributions when they offer so little information of value.  Granted, I realize that we could all probably use the extra money, and web hosting space isn’t all that cheap (though I do think that $100/yr. really isn’t that bad of a price to pay), but I really have to question the ethics of asking for money for the mundane.  It’s an appealing temptation, I’ll grant you, but the way I see it is that if you aren’t contributing something that consumers can actually use, you probably have no right to ask that they pay you for your opinions.  And of course, blog readers don’t have to donate anything; there’s no obligation there to do so.  Just the very existence of the form, though, smacks of the guy on the street who is able-bodied yet holds out his hand for a donation.  Maybe I’m the only one who sees it this way, though.  I just feel like it’s a bit unethical to be asking for handouts, but then again, I was raised to believe that you make what you earn, and I don’t see how some of these bloggers are earning much of anything.  Just because you can doesn’t mean that you should.

But that’s just my opinion.  Take it for what it’s worth.

  1. And yes, I am a Star Trek fan, though I doubt I could technically be considered a Trekkie – not fanatical enough.[back]

Blind Links

Permalink

Oh, good grief. 

Eric Zorn, of the Chicago Tribune, writes about how angry he gets with bloggers who build blind links into their articles because of how much time it apparently wastes for the reader to click on the link to determine if the material contained therein is interesting to them.  I left a comment on the article and on another site that referenced the article and got reamed in both places.  Seriously, folks, what gives?

If I’m writing an article, as far as I’m concerned, the part I’m writing is the only part that matters.  If I include a blind link within the text, it’s because something on that linked site is, in my mind, somehow relevant to the topic at hand – whether it be another related article I’ve written, or supplementary material that my readers might want to investigate further, or something that might only be linked in a very subtle way in my own mind.1 I value a smooth and continuous stream of thought in my writing, something that flows easily from Point 1 to Point 2 to Point 3 and so on, so I hate building links into the discussion in such a way that only disrupts the flow, both for me and for my readers.  The way I see it, if you’re on my site reading, you’re there to see what I have to say about the topic under discusssion and then contribute your responses, if you so choose.  The links are completely optional.  If you want to click them and read more on the issue, feel free.  But you’re under absolutely no obligation to do so.  Read a different way, if you don’t want to click through, then don’t.  No one’s holding a gun to your head.

Apparently, both Zorn and others think that this practice is rude and inconsiderate.  I disagree.  I don’t see how blind links do anything other than document part of the intellectual process the writer followed to get to the article in question.  I honestly don’t mind when others put blind links in their articles.  Sometimes I follow them; sometimes I don’t.  Either way, there’s no reason to get in a twist about it.

Am I the only one that sees this as no big deal at all?  Or does everyone else think that blind links are rude, too?  So far, all I’ve seen are responses from the people who get really upset about this.

  1. Besides, you can usually get a general idea of where the link is headed by what text serves as the hyperlink.  I deliberately try to make all my links somewhat apparent like that.[back]

Voice in the Wilderness

Permalink

Another atheist blog got added to my blogroll today.  Obviously, I don’t agree with the vast majority of this young lady’s opinions, but I do find that her articles are articulate and very thought-provoking.  I also find myself deeply saddened (though, I’m sure she would probably say that there is no reason for me to feel that way).

Here is one of those individuals whose writing gives me so much to think about and say in response – counter opinions and counterarguments to every belief, perception, and conclusion she poses, assurances that there are ‘religious answers’ to all her questions, promises that there really are religious people out there who do actually seek unity in their faith, rather than divisions and sectarianisms.  But she is also one of those individuals who is widely read by a diverse audience.  There are already many believers who are shouting their own thoughts and opinions in response – many of whom seem to have both correct theology and an appropriate attitude of respect and compassions, many of whom do not. 

It seems like it would be a vain effort to add my own voice to the throng.  I would be just one noise in the din, one that would, in all likelihood, be lost or ignored.  Would it even be worth the effort to add my opinion to those already offered, my assurances to those already given?  It seems like a futile effort, particularly when there are others who are already saying exactly what I would say, particularly when those others have already been shrugged off.

This is one of those times and places where I feel like it might be wiser to just remain silent.  I don’t know if she is even still searching for answers; it certainly seems like she has arrived at an ironclad conclusion, one that she will not be shaken from – at least not easily.

This is possibly the first and biggest proof as to why virtual relationships will never replace real ones.  As much as I love the digital realm for sharing ideas and furthering discussion and the expansion of one’s own mind, when it comes right down to it, blogs and discussion forums will never prove an adequate substitute for a physical presence in someone’s life.

It has been suggested that the next Billy Graham will be a geek ; to wit, the next great evangelist will be a blogger.  And this may be true, to an extent.  Blogging has certainly allowed many to give voice to their convictions and inspire and encourage others with truth from Scripture.  Talk is cheap ; it will only convince an unbeliever of just so much.  Ultimately, your actions must back up your words, and they have consistently proven to be far more persuasive than anything that can ever be said.

I don’t know if someone like this young lady can ever be convinced that God really does exist, let alone that He loves each and every one of us.  I do know that no amount of talk has convinced her to this point, and the actions that she has seen by the religous at large has proven to her that God does not exist.  But I also know that a single person can have a profound impact on an individual.  I know that even the most hardened atheist can come to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ.  But I also know that it is usually those personal relationships with other living, breathing human beings that serves as the catalyst.  So, as much as we all love our little digital worlds, as much as we all love our writing, there comes a time when the keyboard needs to be set aside and the computer turned off, when we need to put on our shoes, tie up the laces, and take a walk in the real world.  The sunshine will do us good, and maybe, just maybe, we will be the one who impacts someone in a profound way so that they can see Jesus.