<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Lag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/</link>
	<description>Trapped within my own mind</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-19604</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-19604</guid>
		<description>Shaun &#187; Yeah, Firefox has gotten pretty bulky lately.  I've heard that the next major release version is supposed to help alleviate some of the bloat.  We'll see how that goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shaun &raquo; Yeah, Firefox has gotten pretty bulky lately.&nbsp; I&#8217;ve heard that the next major release version is supposed to help alleviate some of the bloat.&nbsp; We&#8217;ll see how that goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-19159</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-19159</guid>
		<description>Funny, I'm viewing this post in Konqueror right now after googling for solutions to my lag problem in Firefox under Ubuntu 7.10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I&#8217;m viewing this post in Konqueror right now after googling for solutions to my lag problem in Firefox under Ubuntu 7.10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-14073</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 19:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-14073</guid>
		<description>Heh, well, not all of us run Ubuntu.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, well, not all of us run Ubuntu.&nbsp; ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-14005</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 02:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-14005</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jim.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jim.&nbsp; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeismicMike</title>
		<link>http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-13985</link>
		<dc:creator>SeismicMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 02:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-13985</guid>
		<description>You know, Firefox in Ubuntu has almost none of those problems you've mentioned. I run it with Beryl/Compiz on my 1.7ghz processor with 512Mb of ram and hardly every lock it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Firefox in Ubuntu has almost none of those problems you&#8217;ve mentioned. I run it with Beryl/Compiz on my 1.7ghz processor with 512Mb of ram and hardly every lock it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-13951</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 01:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-13951</guid>
		<description>Hey, no problem.  I knew what you meant.  :)  And yeah, I had that plugin installed already.  I'd just deactivated it awhile back while trying to sort out a server problem I was having.  It's active again now, though, and allows a 30-minute window for commenters to make edits.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, no problem.&nbsp; I knew what you meant.&nbsp; :)  And yeah, I had that plugin installed already.&nbsp; I&#8217;d just deactivated it awhile back while trying to sort out a server problem I was having.&nbsp; It&#8217;s active again now, though, and allows a 30-minute window for commenters to make edits.&nbsp; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-13945</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 23:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-13945</guid>
		<description>That would be "work" with not "with with"  Groan.  (There's a plug in that will let commenters edit...hint, hint)  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be &#8220;work&#8221; with not &#8220;with with&#8221;  Groan.&nbsp; (There&#8217;s a plug in that will let commenters edit&#8230;hint, hint)  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-13944</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 23:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-13944</guid>
		<description>Mine takes up a little more space than yours, but I typically only with with about 20 tabs at a time.  Thankfully, I've experienced very few crashes or lags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mine takes up a little more space than yours, but I typically only with with about 20 tabs at a time.&nbsp; Thankfully, I&#8217;ve experienced very few crashes or lags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-13931</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 10:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-13931</guid>
		<description>It's a good program.  It's just becomes a bit of a monstrosity in recent versions.  I'm kind of hoping it'll start to get better again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good program.&nbsp; It&#8217;s just becomes a bit of a monstrosity in recent versions.&nbsp; I&#8217;m kind of hoping it&#8217;ll start to get better again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaryJane</title>
		<link>http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-13924</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryJane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 07:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shamuswrites.com/2007/08/17/firefox-lag/#comment-13924</guid>
		<description>I recently upgraded to the newest release of FF. Ive also noticed the etensive resource hogging although i havent had any crashs as of yet.  But i do have to frequently close FF and reopen it. And i cant have as many tabs running as i usually do.  Especially on flash websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently upgraded to the newest release of FF. Ive also noticed the etensive resource hogging although i havent had any crashs as of yet.&nbsp; But i do have to frequently close FF and reopen it. And i cant have as many tabs running as i usually do.&nbsp; Especially on flash websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
