Shamus Writes
msgbartop
Trapped within my own mind
msgbarbottom

27 Feb 06 Gay Adoptions

Sometimes, finding consistency and balance in various aspects of my personal worldview isn’t easy.  For instance, I believe that homosexuality is wrong, that it is sin, and that it should be avoided and abstained from by even the most blatant of homosexual-leaning individuals.  Yet, I believe in the freedoms espoused by our country’s laws and ideals, and as such I believe that it is allowable for homosexuals to live their lives as they see fit, so long as they do not, in the process, attempt to steal or destroy the rights of those not like them.

I also believe that it is a waste of time and resources, not to mention a detriment to the testimony of Christians everywhere, to pursue a course of legal action that will bar homosexuals from gaining the rights to marry and tap into those resources reserved for married heterosexual couples.  I am not convinced that this is the proper (or most effective) approach to ministering God’s love to the homosexual community since legal action generally only fosters anger and resentment against God’s people (a resentment that, admittedly, the Christian community has brought upon itself). 

These questions, then, beget still other questions – where do we draw the line, or should the line even be drawn?  For instance, if we allow homosexuals to marry and gain benefits that are reserved for married couples, per the freedoms of this nation in which we live, do we then also allow them to adopt children (since homosexuals are biologically unable to produce children on their own)?  If we acknowledge that homosexuality is wrong, that it is sinful, are we then justified in allowing them to raise children, particularly since we have already established a precedent of allowances in permitting marriage and benefits rights?

Add to this another value – I believe that allowing the government to dictate and regulate every part1 of our lives is a very bad thing, as it restricts so many of the very freedoms we hold dear.  Should the government even be involved in this process, should it take a special interest here by disallowing certain freedoms because one group2 has fears and concerns?  My primary concern in allowing homosexuals to adopt is not necessarily that these children will grow to themselves become homosexual, since at least part of homosexual leanings can be attributed to biology and physiology3, or that they will be psychologically handicapped or confused as a result of being raised by same-sex parents, since it can be argued that many children coming out of abusive, heterosexual homes are also extremely screwed up. 

My concern is that children coming out of homosexual homes will already be conditioned to view homosexuality as every bit as acceptable as heterosexuality.  I don’t have a problem with them being tolerant of homosexuals having relationships and getting married4, but I wonder if they will ever come to recognize that homosexuality is actually wrong.  How will children raised in such homes handle the tension should they come to accept Christ as their Savior and learn what the Bible has to say about homosexuality?  Suddenly, they are faced with the knowledge that homosexuality is sin and the conflict that their parents are living in sin. 

I suppose, though, that this would likely be not much different than those children faced with a parent who has had an affair, who is abusive, who has divorced, who is addicted to drugs or alcohol, or any of a dozen other vices.  Maybe the problems would be no more severe; they would just be problems of a different nature, problems that the Christian community would have to adapt to in order to face head-on, to face with the power to heal.  Homosexuals who are allowed to adopt would give children with no homes a place to live, albeit one that might be less than ideal. 5

I’m still not sure that I endorse homosexual adoption.  It’s a process that I am still working through in my own head, and I am very open to feedback and opinions from others on this issue.  Where does the line between personal freedom and the welfare of the majority fall?  My own concerns in allowing homosexuals to adopt is for the welfare of the children involved.  Unfortunately, this is still such a new issue that there is very little long-term research available to describe what the effects of such practices might be.  In the meantime, I do urge Christians to be patient and compassionate, because as we have seen in so many other places, becoming angry and hateful and spiteful does absolutely nothing to help the situation.  The world is changing around us almost faster than we can keep up, but the pre-eminence of Christ is still able to effect healing and change on a powerful, widespread scale that should be humbling to us all.  We should remember that and tap into before considering any actions that might prove harmful to the cause of Christ.

  1. Or simply too many parts[back]
  2. i.e. Christians, in this case[back]
  3. Though certainly not all, since there is a definite link between homosexuality and disillusionment with the opposite gender or a need for an absence parental figure[back]
  4. Again, I believe homosexuals have that right in this country[back]
  5. But doesn’t that happen everyday already?[back]

Tags: , , , ,



Reader's Comments

  1. |

    Wow.  This is awesome.  I believe I will link to it from my blog and save myself the trouble of writing my own post for today! :)
    grace

  2. |

    To play devil’s advocate – is it any different than any child who comes to their faith and sees the flaws and sins of their parents?  If homosexuality is a sin – and I use “if” because I am still struggling with my belief on that – how is it any worse than any other sin?  And if a child is loved and cared for by two people, regardless of their sin, wouldn’t that be an improvement over living in an institution all their lives, or flitting from one foster home to another?  Being born into a home where the parents did want it, or are substance abusers?  According to the Bible, all sins are equal in the eyes of God – it is the consequences that are different.  In that light, is homosexuality THAT terrible that we must be so offended by it?  I’m NOT suggesting that you accept sin as just a “ho-hum” issue.  But I do not understand the abhorrence of a homosexual man, when a man who is an adulterer or holds a criminal record we reach out to with love.

  3. |

    Honestly, I don’t understand that particular dichotomy, either.  You’re right – we reach out to adulterers and hardened criminals but reject the homosexual, and that ought not to be.  We should be reaching out to everyone equally, which is part of my point.

  4. |

    I saw a wonderful edition of “Way of the Master” on tv recently that dealt with how to witness to gays.  It was really wonderful because they emphasized that acting on homosexual feelings is the sin, not being homosexual.  I just thought when I saw it, It’s about time somebody pointed out that sin is sin, and this particular sin is no better and especially no worse, than any other.

    That having been said, at this point in time I am still against gay adoption because I don’t think all the evidence is in as to the long-term effects on the children.

  5. |

    [...] Breviarium Ecclesiae By Funky Dung Curt Jester didn’t create this?!? If those beads made you roll your eyes, these might make you scream.Is there truly no sexual ethic in the Bible?Onion Radio reports on a new Christian porn film.Going to church may soon catch up to shopping as favorite passtime in Ireland.Pontificator Al Kimel asks, "What is the dogmatic status of Ordinatio Sacerdotalis?"Check out this interesting way of ministering to people in the sex industry.What part of "when they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage" isn’t clear?Mark Shea presents a sampling from the Moloch’s scriptures.Writer’s Blog has some interesting thoughts on gay adoptions.Does the Catholic Church have a monopoly on the word "catholic" (which means "universal")?Ex-Christians. Ex-ministers. Ex-apologists. Debunking Christianity. Interesting. Why are Fundamentalists afraid of lectio divina?I think the guy described here would be happier as a Unitarian Universalist."Christ yes, the Church no" is an unacceptable attitude, says Benedict XVI.For the curious, here’s what coverts to the Catholics had to profess back before the introduction of the RCIA. I wish it was still in use.Just how catholic is the Catholic Church?  Find that and other questions in this denomination-themed Carnival of Etymologies.Anybody want to help Rob understand why gay adoptions are gravely immoral?Why are Fundamentalists afraid of meditation and mysticism?Joe Carter has a great post about gluttony at the Evangelical Outpost.If you’re a married Christian, please consider taking this survey.Rob and Nate throw their two cents each into the partial-birth abortion ban debate.Does anybody know where I can find this movie on DVD?Please pray for this sick little girl.What do you folks think of Busted Halo?Read a short history of St. Blog’s Parish.A crucifix made from an integrated circuit?!?If you loved me, you’d buy me one of these shirts.  Dale Price talks about the problems with Republicans from an orthodox Catholic perspective.Mark Shea points us to a new blog devoted to convincing Mormons of the truth of Catholicism. [...]



Leave a Comment